As the reviews through the news United States is going to adopt the religion through its politics by introducing Obama as the democrat leader. Meaning to say, since Obama is known as the person with the “virtue context” his pillars may improve the social believes[1].
Are the politicians trying to run the crusade amid U.S and Asia or they are going to build up the religion through the U.S society to gain the long term achievements by setting the public’s mind set in one united direction?
References:
- "Aljazeera news" web site. The US. election diary, followed by URL: http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/imperium/2008/08/2008818858024416.html
14 comments:
Perhaps you are telling the truth but the need of proofing it is required in the sense of demonstration of the accurate data. Meaning to say you must check out the rest of the country’s politics in order to get the clue on how the religion or the culture has been affected through the imposed strategies, and bear in mind we cant simply change the publics’ mind sets and it requires at least 10 generations not just 4 years!!!
ObaMa!!! The great change by the small fellow. With no doubt the white people were the dominants of the society since the existence days of states as it is now. Freedom, decision making, authority were belonged to nobody except white fellows. After the disaster of 9-11, Middle East war and financial crises the world could not accept the dominance of the violence. The guy as the Muslim and Christian context has came to make the change in order to build up the friendly gatherings and communities among the different religions.
Hi! such a good thinking. this is first time that a black man became a president in America.So far i think here the Americans prove that the racism are gone.Now they can judgment with their brine.As a citizen of a country personally i will never thing where the president from he is black/ white. i will watch how he maintain the country.
Hope the American will take Obama (which known as first black president in America) positively. Hope it also will be change the mentality.
I think with Obama in the seat, he might not use any of that. Since the time he gave his first speech, it was always "Change We Need". He might use people power to preach to the people how they want him to deliver the message but still make his point. In this way, it will be more acceptable. With this, the public will be united in cooperating with him.
I think since Obama chosen as new president of America, it is bring good thing for America because it is proved that American's people already think more mature. They choose somebody because of how he think for the country and not because his color.
Therefore let’s see what will Obama do to and for America as new president of America? Will he bring America to be good or bad?
Bardia, bardia. I thought you were educated.............
Listen, contrary from where you come from, Other nations don't react from a religious base. The US, as well as other western nations have this clause on their constitution,.... "separation of the church and the sate".... Bush is against homosexuality, but he could not ban it, because his religous beliefs have nothing to do with the nation. America has no official religion, and therefore has nothing to promote, contrary to other countries.
Obama no doubt would adopt a different policy to Bush's foreign policy, but make no mistake,he would not cordone extreme acts. America would always fight back if attacked, even if eddy murphy is the president!
Sally, Obama is no small fellow! He's taller than Bardia (and even more sexy)!
That’s true dear Eric, but I got one question. In the1800s the crusade has occurred through the Europe, the nation’s pillar was based on religion as the paradigm. Until the 90s the pillar of any economy was its politics as the communist have practiced this concept. Since the eve of 90s the communist systems tried to establish the new rules, in the sense of separation of nation from politics and from economy and now almost the entire of the nations except North Korea are practicing the mentioned concept. Can you see the transitions? Can you see the gross changes? Don’t you think that the Uncle Sam needs some meditation and relaxation? Just check out the surge in the sales of Feng Shui in the western nations to get the clue why I made the statement of “need of west to be more virtue and adaptation of religion”. Man the concept of your statement is correct, but regardless on how educated I am, I can give you the fact that in any society there is the need of conversion, to settle down and chill down the conflicts, this is psychology not politics not economy. So, there is the need of adaptation the religion amid the crowd to settle them otherwise the main disaster “social disaster” and suicide may start up through the coming 6 months as the great depression. In addition please be honest to your self, do you think they chose Muslim context and African/Indonesian/Malaysian context person just for the fun of it?!!?!?
PS. Thanks for your statement it’s such a pleasure for me to be compared with Dr. Obama. Hope for the next decades I may be compared with Dr. Ben S. Bernanke
i agree with eric obama's statement on how nations don't react from a religious base. The US, as well as other western nations have this clause on their constitution,.... "separation of the church and the sate".... Bush is against homosexuality, but he could not ban it, because his religous beliefs have nothing to do with the nation. America has no official religion, and therefore has nothing to promote, contrary to other countries.
Obama no doubt would adopt a different policy to Bush's foreign policy, but make no mistake,he would not condone extreme acts. America would always fight back if attacked, even if eddy murphy is the president!
Cruzades are the first things in ur mind, but tell you what, read more about it. Uncle Sam needs more relation? Tell me more about it! You know this is real, that you can go to Washington, and pray to who ever, but can any body go to saudi arabia for example, and worship his own god? The answer is evident.
As I know the American are not same as other nations they are more flexible and more freedom that is the reason they chose Obama as a president of America. And I’m very sure the Americans chose the correct person as a president because he is very talented and he have capability person to use their power.
Well, my friend America is a free country, I agree with Eric that they don’t react on the basis of religion. Now Obama been elected as president, he believe in change and that’s what American people needs. Obama policy is totally different compared to that of Bush.
The antiwar left is not too happy about Obama’s national security choices. A speech Obama made six years ago indicates that Obama’s approach to foreign policy is much like that of George H.W. Bush. Obama may prove to be less an idealist than a realist.
A Washington Post article by E.J. Dionne Jr. entitled “Obama’s Bush Doctrine” explains that the meaning behind Obama’s “apparent” decision to keep Robert Gates on as defense secretary and to select Hillary Clinton as secretary of state can be discovered in understanding Obama’s words and his George H.W. Bush approach to foreign policy.
According to the article, Obama’s has been “relying heavily on foreign policy specialists” that are closely associated with Clinton. His choice of Clinton will enhance his image of strength because Clinton has “strong ties to the military” and she has a “carefully cultivated image of tough-mindedness.”
Not only did Obama state five times that he didn’t oppose all wars, and that he would willingly “take up arms myself” to prevent another 9/11 from happening, it appears that Obama was echoing Brent Scowcroft’s “widely noted 2002 op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal, published six weeks before Obama gave his speech.”
Article source:-http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-change-bush-just-might-believe-in.html
Obama has always been a pragmatic realist. His brilliant performance to that is exactly why US people supported him and they knew would occur.
Descriminating by race and religion can affect the growth for any country and descriminating is not solution of problems,it's increase the problems.Obama is chosen as new president for America and nations of America proves that People comes first not religion or race.
Post a Comment