Who is Going to Trade Weapon?

I was flipping through the history and I did understand that in the year of 1947 the United Nation stated the Palestinian region as the Jewish and Muslim territory. Regardless on what happened in the past or so called the former colonized nation by the United Kingdom during the 1923-1948; this country did slide in to the deep struggle among the Jewish and Muslims. Conflicts of 1967, accord of 1993, assassination of Ahmad Yasin and so called the temporary truce agreement of 2005 governs the depth of crusade among the Muslim and Jewish to build up their own autonomy.


Lets come back to this era, the pro Muslim context president elect of the States, the Anti-Secular leaflets passed by scores in the United Kingdom, the Anti- God petition on the banners festooned by the British busses, Toney Blair’s statement of 2003 regarding to his pillars as the Anti-Secularism paradigm and the financial support of 150000 Ponds from Anti-Secularists in the United kingdom to demonstrate their anti God petition. What’s going on? Is the world trying to say some thing? Are we witnessing the ending of crusades for religion?

So, what may happen if the conflicts in the Middle East get settled? Truce of Middle East will lead to the halt in Arab nations, Syria and Iran’s support on Gaza strip. The peace of Middle East will lead to the peace of Iran and States and therefore Chaves and Castro brothers’ accord with States. So who is going to trade weapons?!!!!

What Do You Think?

Regarding to the Aljazeera news, the new plan of infrastructure has defined by president-elect Obama and it has to be approved by the congress of the States[1].

The new plan consisted of construction the; national infrastructure such as high ways and buildings, refurbish school buildings, making them more energy-efficient and equipping them with computers.

Is there any better way to reconstruct the United States regardless on the huge budget deficit she has?

Don’t you think the credit crunch, rate cuts of Alan Greenspan and bust of his bubble were with no intension?!!!

I believe the entire of disasters were man made to create the opportunity for the country with the largest budget deficit to reconstruct her self without considering to her balance of liquidities. What do you think?


Reference:

[1] [Aljazeera news] Obama plans the infrastructure followed by URL: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/12/2008126201050213732.html

Auto makers or the Entrepreneurs?

The U.S. budget deficit swells to record $455 billion in fiscal 2008 and made the country the largest budget deficit among the nations[1]. Regardless on how much they are liable to the nations, they have pledged to tackle the economy by over 700 billions of dollars to build up their economy which may scratch the other nations' back.

As it can be inducted, the policy of the States, governs such an investment strategy which tackles the nations' economy by alleviating the internal fiscal policy.

So don’t you think, building up the infrastructure and stimulate the financial institutions and entrepreneurs must be prioritized to the bail out of the car manufactures?

Who got the cash to buy the car? If they spend over 30 billions of dollars to bail out the 3 auto makers, who is going to buy the car regardless on how fuel efficient they are?



Reference:

[1][Reuters] U.S. budget deficit followed by URL: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE49D9GL20081015.

Psychotherapy or stimulation?

Hey guys, as I was reviewing the news, I noticed the recent research conducted by the Harvard professor which was alleged: "The decade of the Great Depression, cosmetic sales increased 25 percent." After the downturn following Sept. 11, lipstick sales doubled”. As the interpretation we may simply find the complementary relation-ship between psychology and economy[1].

On the other note I found the interesting subject which was arguing about the psychological strategies which may improve the market trust among the societies to stimulate the economy. Coming up with the idea of the luxurious exhibitions for the reach segments of the societies by selling the market skimmed products or offering the high end tour packages which again targets the reach levels of societies are the recent strategies of entrepreneurs to get back the market trust and try to tackle the psychology of economy.

What sort of strategies you suggest to give back the trust through the markets? Are the financial stimulations and bailouts sufficient enough to see the surge through market shares?


Reference

[1] "Yahoo buzz", "The Lipstick Economy" followed by URL:
http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/92031/

The Historic Stop

This is the first time since 1953 that a U.S. Secretary of State has visited Libya, the last U.S. Secretary of State to visit Tripoli was John Foster Dulles in May 1953, before Rice was even born[1]. Regarding to reports Rice may sign a trade and investment deal during her visit but the political analysts say the major signal is to start up a new era in U.S.-Libyan relations that have been considered by decades of mistrust and violence[1].

On the other hand after the 23 years of marking Libya as the region of violence, Libya and Russia have signed a deal on civil nuclear co-operation during a visit to Moscow by Muammar Gaddafi the Libyan president[2].

Is this could be considered as the psychological preparation for the public’s mind sets to see the new relations among the Non-Americanized countries and the United States?

Is this could be the guide line for the countries who are accused of the sponsors of terrorism?

Are the accused countries of the sponsors of terrorism are going to be allowed to access to the nuclear facilities under the supervision of United States?

Are all these issues considered as the plots for the dominants of the world to have the nuclear facilities under the supervision of United States?

Are we watching the 21st century’s colonial method?!!!


References

• [1] Aljazeera news " Libya and United States" followed by URL: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/newsfull.php?newid=158112
• [2] Aljazeera news " Libya and Russia" followed by URL: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2008/11/20081124572413465.html

Stall or Tackle?!

The modern global steel industry is dominated by China; the low consumption luxurious car is dominated by Japan, Lenovo now owns IBM's personal computing division, most Apple-branded products are made in China and science parks around Beijing and Shanghai are full of American brand names that have moved their research centers overseas[1].

The U.S. has now shed 605,000 jobs since the beginning of the year; The U.S. unemployment rate hits 6.1%, highest level in five years; Employers slashed 84,000 jobs in August, steeper cuts than analysts expected[2].

With no doubt, out sourcing of the American production system to the lower labor rate countries has considered as the most beneficial strategy which has led to the higher profit achievement for the business runners.

Don’t you think that the allocation of one quarter gained benefit of the out sourced income is not enough to tackle the current unemployment in the United States?


References:

• [1] Aljazeera news, “China trade dominance looms over US” followed by URL: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/10/20081021143831584145.html
• [2] Lose Angeles Times “The Unemployment and presidential campaign” followed by URL: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-fi-economy6-2008sep06,0,3121791.story

How Feasible is the Surviving of Capitalist System?

The financial crisis which has occurred in the year of 2008 can be issued as the major disaster through the economical studies. The effects of the September and October’s typhoon through the world’s share markets and financial institutions in the year of 2008 still have not recovered yet [1].

As discussed through the economical literatures the western countries like United States are following the capitalist structure which requires the empowerment and encouragement of the government for the privatization with almost zero intervention of the government on financial issues (Sloman, 2004).

The October 14, in the year of 2008 the ministry of treasury and finance of United States unveiled a plan to inject $250bn of the $700bn bailout into financial institutions [1].

Is that called the capitalist structure or following the communist way of controlling deficits by the government? Is that could be the last days of surviving of the capitalist system through the societies?


References:

1. "Aljazeera news" Global financial crisis followed by URL: http://english.aljazeera.net/business/2008/10/20081014122558818683.html
2. Sloman John, (2004), Economics, 5th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall.