Building the infrastructure or modernizing the military?

I was going through the news and I noticed a column on India’s $30bn plans for the military modernization. Hang on a second, last week there was kind of peaceful talks between two counterparts of India and Pakistan in Egypt. Prior to that, about 2months a go there was an announcement of peace fire among the LTTE and the government of Sri Lanka.

The history has demonstrated that, any nation has either a choice to tackle the economical issues or the political matters. In this financial turmoil and India’s devastating economy, couldn’t the infrastructure projects be taken rather than military options?

So, what could be the real reason of this military improvement plans for India? Preparation for what so called “war on terror” or maybe another civil war in the region?

Who is telling the truth? Davide Hume or Muhammed Ahmed?

Maybe some of my friends are getting obsessed, some may get anxious and some may feel irritated of me! Well, in case you are not included those who are really making the religion sensitized, please respond me back, otherwise I advise you to have a quick look at David Hume’s theory on religion or read some notes on Marx’s theory of alienations.

David Hume believes, religion differences deflect people’s mind sets from political matters.

Let me inspire you by some examples through the history. The collapse of Roman Empire did happen due to the religion conflicts generated by a group of Christian people called Arians against Catholics. The first jihad did happen in Sudan in 1844 as the purpose of invading countries to extend the Islamic constitution throughout the world.

Don’t you think that the concept of religion it self, has been misused as the only factor to rule the world and invade the nations?

Religion or Technology?

I think all of us are pretty familiar with Twitter, Face book, Youtube and so on. The wide coverage and demonstration arrangements of Iranian protesters in one side, the sweet seller who tweets her locations to the subscribers on the other side, are the amazing applications of the hinted channels.

I was just dazzled by this fast track technology. What is going to be the next? Don’t you think the technology is substituting the culture drivers such as religion, race, education, morals and so on?

Just think about it, let’s just picture 20 years ago. What could really unite the people? Nice music, movie, or a final league of football match? Or maybe the religion beliefs? Ok, how about 50 years ago? Don’t you think, the technology is really substituting every thing to merge the globe and unite people in one direction?

It’s been a long time we are evidenced by different theories such as big bang and so on which really is undermining religion beliefs. Don’t you think the new channel which got the duty to unite the people, is going to be technical channels, instead of religion beliefes?

Who is Going to Trade Weapon?

I was flipping through the history and I did understand that in the year of 1947 the United Nation stated the Palestinian region as the Jewish and Muslim territory. Regardless on what happened in the past or so called the former colonized nation by the United Kingdom during the 1923-1948; this country did slide in to the deep struggle among the Jewish and Muslims. Conflicts of 1967, accord of 1993, assassination of Ahmad Yasin and so called the temporary truce agreement of 2005 governs the depth of crusade among the Muslim and Jewish to build up their own autonomy.


Lets come back to this era, the pro Muslim context president elect of the States, the Anti-Secular leaflets passed by scores in the United Kingdom, the Anti- God petition on the banners festooned by the British busses, Toney Blair’s statement of 2003 regarding to his pillars as the Anti-Secularism paradigm and the financial support of 150000 Ponds from Anti-Secularists in the United kingdom to demonstrate their anti God petition. What’s going on? Is the world trying to say some thing? Are we witnessing the ending of crusades for religion?

So, what may happen if the conflicts in the Middle East get settled? Truce of Middle East will lead to the halt in Arab nations, Syria and Iran’s support on Gaza strip. The peace of Middle East will lead to the peace of Iran and States and therefore Chaves and Castro brothers’ accord with States. So who is going to trade weapons?!!!!

What Do You Think?

Regarding to the Aljazeera news, the new plan of infrastructure has defined by president-elect Obama and it has to be approved by the congress of the States[1].

The new plan consisted of construction the; national infrastructure such as high ways and buildings, refurbish school buildings, making them more energy-efficient and equipping them with computers.

Is there any better way to reconstruct the United States regardless on the huge budget deficit she has?

Don’t you think the credit crunch, rate cuts of Alan Greenspan and bust of his bubble were with no intension?!!!

I believe the entire of disasters were man made to create the opportunity for the country with the largest budget deficit to reconstruct her self without considering to her balance of liquidities. What do you think?


Reference:

[1] [Aljazeera news] Obama plans the infrastructure followed by URL: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2008/12/2008126201050213732.html

Auto makers or the Entrepreneurs?

The U.S. budget deficit swells to record $455 billion in fiscal 2008 and made the country the largest budget deficit among the nations[1]. Regardless on how much they are liable to the nations, they have pledged to tackle the economy by over 700 billions of dollars to build up their economy which may scratch the other nations' back.

As it can be inducted, the policy of the States, governs such an investment strategy which tackles the nations' economy by alleviating the internal fiscal policy.

So don’t you think, building up the infrastructure and stimulate the financial institutions and entrepreneurs must be prioritized to the bail out of the car manufactures?

Who got the cash to buy the car? If they spend over 30 billions of dollars to bail out the 3 auto makers, who is going to buy the car regardless on how fuel efficient they are?



Reference:

[1][Reuters] U.S. budget deficit followed by URL: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE49D9GL20081015.

Psychotherapy or stimulation?

Hey guys, as I was reviewing the news, I noticed the recent research conducted by the Harvard professor which was alleged: "The decade of the Great Depression, cosmetic sales increased 25 percent." After the downturn following Sept. 11, lipstick sales doubled”. As the interpretation we may simply find the complementary relation-ship between psychology and economy[1].

On the other note I found the interesting subject which was arguing about the psychological strategies which may improve the market trust among the societies to stimulate the economy. Coming up with the idea of the luxurious exhibitions for the reach segments of the societies by selling the market skimmed products or offering the high end tour packages which again targets the reach levels of societies are the recent strategies of entrepreneurs to get back the market trust and try to tackle the psychology of economy.

What sort of strategies you suggest to give back the trust through the markets? Are the financial stimulations and bailouts sufficient enough to see the surge through market shares?


Reference

[1] "Yahoo buzz", "The Lipstick Economy" followed by URL:
http://buzz.yahoo.com/buzzlog/92031/